
Ordinals and cardinals form the backbone of mathematics. Ordinal numbers describe orderings. Cardinal numbers are the measure of size in mathematics.
They first ordinals are the integers.
, the set containing all integers, is the
ordinal of the integers. The next ordinal
is the successor of
.
This set has one members
just as the successor of 0 has one set, the
set containing the empty set. The successor of
is the set containing
and the successor of
.
Ordinals can be thought of as general way of representing
induction or iteration.
corresponds to iteration that can be characterized by
a loop up to any integer or induction on all the integers.
contains
and all finite successors to
.
contains all finite successors to
.
contains
for all integers n.
corresponds to two nest loops each with a limit
of any integer.
corresponds to loops on the integers nested n deep.
corresponds to loops
on the integers nested n deep where n is a parameter.
All forms of iterations and all induction can be characterized by
some ordinal number. By using infinite sets to describe iteration
one masks over the rich combinatorial structures that are required
to define higher levels of iteration. Recursive iteration is
characterized by the recursive ordinals but there is no recursive
algorithm to describe the structure of all recursive
ordinal s although there is such an
algorithm for any recursive ordinal.
Each integer is a finite cardinal
number. Different integers have
different sizes.
is
the cardinal number of all integers. No one knows what the next
largest cardinal is. Cantor proved that the Cardinal of the reals
is larger than the cardinal of the integers by showing that there
could not exist a one to one map between the integers and reals.
Gödel constructed a model for set theory in which the first
cardinal larger than the integers is the cardinal of the real
numbers. Gödel proved this model was consistent of ZF set
theory was consistent[19,20].
Cohen proved that if ZF set theory is consistent that it is
consistent to assume there exists cardinals greater than the
cardinal of the integers but less than the cardinal of the
reals[11]. This question is known
as the Continuum Hypothesis and is
undecidable in ZF.
If there do not exist completed infinite totalities than there does not exist a single real number let alone the set of all numbers. In that case the set of all real numbers only make sense relative to a given axiom system. The continuum hypothesis is true, false or unprovable in a given formal system, but it has no absolute truth value.

| home | consulting | videos | book | QM FAQ | contact |